Proponents of the marijuana initiative, Prop Z, keep quoting that 1007 residents were polled with 56% supporting dispensaries to make marijuana available to medicinal users. The polling was done in mid-2017. However, Measure Z in its current form was not public until after the poll. For the past few years there have been many iterations of Z and other citizens initiatives that went through some or all the initiative-creation process until legally qualified this year.
An overwhelming majority of those polled seemed to be unaware of city regulations that prohibit medical marijuana dispensaries operating in the city (66%).
What is missing from proponents use of the local poll results, are the qualifying factors that those polled demanded to get their support for medicinal sales. The below are copies of the results.

Location must be 1000 feet from schools stated 84%. What would be their reaction if they knew Prop Z only calls for 600 feet? That is only a 10-15-minute walk.
Dispensaries must be 1000 feet from a treatment center indicated 75%. What if they knew proposition Z allows dispensaries within 600 feet?
“No residential zone” was required by 77%. What if they knew that commercial, industrial, business and mixed-use zones are next door or real close to their residential neighborhoods if Z passes?
Criminal background check necessary for 88%. What would they have said if they knew that felons, who committed the crime more than 4 years ago, could work in their local dispensary, even in their building?
What would be their reaction to allowing dispensaries in mixed use zones, with housing units just above the shop, on the commercial first floor?
What would be their reaction if they knew the city was going to propose BB allowing three delivery facilities to meet the medicinal needs?
What if they knew how limited the cities enforcement will be if Z passes? Very small fines are stated in the proposition and exempts compliance with city ordinances.
What if they knew that getting rid of a bad operator may take a citizen vote?
Did they know that there are no setback requirements for dispensaries from sidewalks?
Once permitted, the city would have little control over the operation of the dispensary, per the measure.
Z does not have any testing facilities. BB does. (See blog on state testing results below).
Applicants can get a license by meeting minimum requirements, ignoring other requirements defined in the Vistas General plan and city ordinances.
The poll was not taken with these important facts on the table, therefore is somewhat invalid. It was just a general “feeling” poll, mostly centered on compassion for medicinal users, many who are terminally ill or in great pain.
What if those polled knew that 20 % of marijuana products failed potency testing, especially edibles, which has seen a 33% rejection rate? (UT page A5 9/12/18) and with unacceptable levels of pesticides, solvents and bacteria, including salmonella. (State Bureau of Cannabis Control.). THC, the psychoactive chemical that causes the high, is not tested now for harmful species of mold and yeast.
The poll was taken (4/17) before the content of Z were known by the public . What if the poll asked the complete question and accurate question this way:
” Do you support 11 marijuana store fronts in your neighborhood, 600 feet away from you, 600 feet from schools, 600 feet from parks, 600 feet from churches, which can be manned by felons, can be in mixed use apartments, that create parking issues, with very little local enforcement control, that would be extremely difficult to force compliance and with unreliable testing results? This is the real Z.
“or do you support three highly controlled delivery locations, determined through public meetings, for delivery to medically qualified users, with three local testing facilities to ensure high quality and safety”? This is BB.
How will you vote? It all depends on you for our future!
Garry